AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 2x 240
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 2x 596.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
• 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 289 Watt
• Around 14% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1792 MB
• 7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 999 MHz
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1832 vs 1206
• 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 402 vs 103
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3443
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3107
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3443
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3107

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 925 MHz
• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21048 vs 10229

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1832 1206
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	402 103
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10229 21048
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3107

Compare specifications (specs)