AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

NVIDIA Quadro K620

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1124 MHz
2.2x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
Around 45% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10293 vs 6869
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.848 vs 22.112
Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 438.581 vs 297.631
Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.268 vs 1.427
3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.988 vs 15.363
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.235 vs 99.125
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3241 vs 2970
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 2490
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3329
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3241 vs 2970
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 2490
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3329

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 June 2017 vs 22 July 2014
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Pipelines	512 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	10293 vs 6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	30.848 vs 22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	438.581 vs 297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.268 vs 1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	46.988 vs 15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	139.235 vs 99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3241 vs 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709 vs 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3241 vs 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709 vs 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 59% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 1871
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 387

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 925 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2220 vs 1871
PassMark - G2D Mark	480 vs 387

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1871

2220

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

387

480

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10293

6869

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.848

22.112

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

438.581

297.631

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.268

1.427

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

46.988

15.363

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

139.235

99.125

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3241

2970

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3709

2490

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3241

2970

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3709

2490

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3329

Name	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark	1871	2220
PassMark - G2D Mark	387	480
Geekbench - OpenCL	10293	6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	30.848	22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	438.581	297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.268	1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	46.988	15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	139.235	99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3241	2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709	2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3241	2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709	2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		702

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	NVIDIA Quadro K620
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Lexa	GM107
Launch date	12 June 2017	22 July 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	$189.89
Place in performance rating	818	953
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Price now		$189.93
Value for money (0-100)		15.23
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	1058 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	863.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	384
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	41 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm	160 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	56 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management