AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3584
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 11,340 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 45% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 11 GB
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 2406.499
- 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 25.833
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 1002.573
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2017 vs 10 March 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3584 |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops vs 11,340 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 11 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 vs 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 vs 1002.573 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18566 vs 12470
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 732
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67645 vs 65451
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 vs 174.714
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 17.305
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 13848
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3336
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 13848
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3336
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18566 vs 12470 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 vs 732 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67645 vs 65451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 vs 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 vs 17.305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 vs 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 vs 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3336 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12470 | 18566 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 | 934 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65451 | 67645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 174.714 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.305 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9874 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 10 | GP102 |
Launch date | 10 July 2017 | 10 March 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 208 | 206 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 11,340 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 3584 |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 11,800 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |