AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3584
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 11,340 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 45% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 11 GB
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 2406.499
• 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 25.833
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 1002.573

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• 5.8x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18567 vs 12470
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 732
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67458 vs 65451
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 vs 174.714
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 17.305
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 13848
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3336
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 13848
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12470 18567
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	732 934
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	65451 67458
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	174.714 205.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3924.968 2406.499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.305 19.591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	175.219 25.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1226.861 1002.573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13848 15019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3680 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13848 15019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3680 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3357

Compare specifications (specs)