AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs NVIDIA Tesla M10

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 460 and NVIDIA Tesla M10 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3453 vs 3172
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 410
• Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15221 vs 10046
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.755 vs 50.918
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 226.93 vs 180.026
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3306
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3306

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M10

• Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 907 MHz
• 7.8x more texture fill rate: 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 58.05 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 4x 640 vs 1024
• 3.6x better floating-point performance: 4x 1,672 gflops vs 1,858 gflops
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4x 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 5080 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.191 vs 44.089
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 814.192 vs 594.914
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5204 vs 4664
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3693 vs 1842
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5204 vs 4664
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3693 vs 1842

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 460
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M10

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3453 3172
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	679 410
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15221 10046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.089 46.191
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	594.914 814.192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	55.755 50.918
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	226.93 180.026
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4664 5204
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1842 3693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4664 5204
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1842 3693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3306

Compare specifications (specs)