AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 3472.2x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 53.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 6.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29361 vs 4657
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7730 vs 1870
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7730 vs 1870
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3595 vs 1596
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3595 vs 1596
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3309
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3309
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 587 vs 299
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5929 vs 1237
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 1 September 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 24 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29361 vs 4657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 587 vs 299 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5929 vs 1237 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 85 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29361 | 4657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 587 | 299 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5929 | 1237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 1 September 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 369 | 1234 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 189 million |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |