AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 2.9x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • 3472.2x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
  • 53.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 24
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
  • 6.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29361 vs 4657
  • 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7730 vs 1870
  • 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7730 vs 1870
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3595 vs 1596
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3595 vs 1596
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3309
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3309
  • Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 587 vs 299
  • 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5929 vs 1237
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 vs 1 September 2017
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
Boost clock speed 1250 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Texture fill rate 100 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1280 vs 24
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 14 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 29361 vs 4657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7730 vs 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7730 vs 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3595 vs 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3595 vs 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 vs 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 vs 3309
PassMark - G2D Mark 587 vs 299
PassMark - G3D Mark 5929 vs 1237

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

  • 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 85 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 85 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
29361
4657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7730
1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7730
1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3595
1596
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3595
1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
3309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
3309
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
587
299
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5929
1237
Name AMD Radeon Pro 5300M Intel UHD Graphics 630
Geekbench - OpenCL 29361 4657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7730 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7730 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3595 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3595 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 3309
PassMark - G2D Mark 587 299
PassMark - G3D Mark 5929 1237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.327
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 68

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M Intel UHD Graphics 630

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Generation 9.5
Code name Navi 14 Coffee Lake GT2
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 1 September 2017
Place in performance rating 369 1234
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1250 MHz 1200 MHz
Compute units 20
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1280 24
Pixel fill rate 40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 100 GTexel/s 28.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 189 million
Floating-point performance 460.8 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x1
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 192 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync