AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 7.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29361 vs 3802
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7730 vs 2283
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7730 vs 2283
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3595 vs 3299
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3595 vs 3299
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1913
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1913
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 587 vs 239
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5929 vs 1202
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 22 March 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29361 vs 3802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 vs 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 vs 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 vs 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 vs 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 1913 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 587 vs 239 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5929 vs 1202 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 85 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29361 | 3802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 2283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 1913 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 587 | 239 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5929 | 1202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 14 | GK107 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 369 | 1188 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 950 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 1,270 million |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |