AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • 6.7x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 7.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29361 vs 3802
  • 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7730 vs 2283
  • 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7730 vs 2283
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3595 vs 3299
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3595 vs 3299
  • Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1913
  • Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1913
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 587 vs 239
  • 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5929 vs 1202
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 vs 22 March 2012
Boost clock speed 1250 MHz vs 950 MHz
Pipelines 1280 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 29361 vs 3802
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7730 vs 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7730 vs 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3595 vs 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3595 vs 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 vs 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 vs 1913
PassMark - G2D Mark 587 vs 239
PassMark - G3D Mark 5929 vs 1202

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

  • Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 85 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 85 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
29361
3802
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7730
2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7730
2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3595
3299
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3595
3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
1913
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
1913
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
587
239
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5929
1202
Name AMD Radeon Pro 5300M NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Geekbench - OpenCL 29361 3802
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7730 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7730 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3595 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3595 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 1913
PassMark - G2D Mark 587 239
PassMark - G3D Mark 5929 1202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.111
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 414

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Kepler
Code name Navi 14 GK107
Launch date 13 Nov 2019 22 March 2012
Place in performance rating 369 1188
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1250 MHz 950 MHz
Compute units 20
Core clock speed 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1280 384
Pixel fill rate 40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 100 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 1,270 million
CUDA cores 384
Floating-point performance 652.8 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.1 12 API
OpenCL 2.0 1.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 192 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 DDR3\GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus