AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro T1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 587 vs 404
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 587 vs 404 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 29361
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 7730
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 7730
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3595
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3595
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6494 vs 5929
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 vs 29361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 7730 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 7730 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3350 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 vs 5929 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29361 | 32981 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3359 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 587 | 404 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5929 | 6494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 14 | TU117 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 369 | 400 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | 69.84 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | 4.470 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | 2.235 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | 46.56 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 69.84 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 128 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |