AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 vs 577
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 vs 1294.279
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 vs 8.756
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.947 vs 91.78
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 vs 569.916

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1300 MHz
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7878 vs 6834
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39420 vs 36530
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.955 vs 105.82
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 9175
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3670
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 9175
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3670
• Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3598 vs 3426

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6834 7878
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	675 577
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36530 39420
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	105.82 134.955
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860.146 1294.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.238 8.756
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.947 91.78
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	596.819 569.916
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9175 10959
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9175 10959
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 3598

Compare specifications (specs)