AMD Radeon Pro 560 versus AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 560 and AMD Radeon HD 7970M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 560
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 907 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 6% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5080 MHz versus 4800 MHz
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 versus 492
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 24 April 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz versus 4800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 versus 492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3339 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970M
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 68 GTexel / s versus 58.05 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 1024
- Environ 17% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,176 gflops versus 1,858 gflops
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3559 versus 3475
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17210 versus 15805
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.181 versus 41.388
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1121.002 versus 614.695
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.355 versus 3.837
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.527 versus 31.274
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 256.99 versus 189.085
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5094 versus 4695
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3692 versus 2280
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5094 versus 4695
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3692 versus 2280
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68 GTexel / s versus 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 1024 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,176 gflops versus 1,858 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3559 versus 3475 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17210 versus 15805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.181 versus 41.388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1121.002 versus 614.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.355 versus 3.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.527 versus 31.274 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 256.99 versus 189.085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5094 versus 4695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3692 versus 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5094 versus 4695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3692 versus 2280 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 3559 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 492 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15805 | 17210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | 51.181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | 1121.002 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | 5.355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | 81.527 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | 256.99 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | 5094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | 3692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | 5094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | 3692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon HD 7970M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 21 | Wimbledon |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 24 April 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 627 | 624 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,858 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.05 GTexel / s | 68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.28 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 560 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
ATIFireGL V5600
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970M
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM
