AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and AMD Radeon Pro 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 3453
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 679
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15445 vs 15290
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 614.695 vs 594.914
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 vs 3.46
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4695 vs 4664
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2280 vs 1842
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4695 vs 4664
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2280 vs 1842
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 30 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 vs 3453 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 679 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15445 vs 15290 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 vs 594.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 vs 3.46 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 vs 4664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 vs 4664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.089 vs 41.388
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.755 vs 31.274
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 226.93 vs 189.085
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.089 vs 41.388 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.755 vs 31.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 226.93 vs 189.085 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 460
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon Pro 460 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 3453 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 679 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15445 | 15290 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | 44.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | 594.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | 3.46 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | 55.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | 226.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | 4664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | 4664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon Pro 460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Baffin |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 30 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 611 | 618 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s | 58.05 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
Boost clock speed | 907 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | 81.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |