AMD Radeon Pro 560 versus AMD Radeon Pro 460
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 560 and AMD Radeon Pro 460 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 560
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 907 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 versus 3453
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 versus 679
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15445 versus 15290
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 614.695 versus 594.914
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 versus 3.46
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4695 versus 4664
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2280 versus 1842
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4695 versus 4664
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2280 versus 1842
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 30 October 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz versus 850 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 versus 3453 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 versus 679 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15445 versus 15290 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 versus 594.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 versus 3.46 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 versus 4664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 versus 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 versus 4664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 versus 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3346 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 460
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.089 versus 41.388
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 55.755 versus 31.274
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 226.93 versus 189.085
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.089 versus 41.388 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.755 versus 31.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 226.93 versus 189.085 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 460
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon Pro 460 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 3453 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 679 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15445 | 15290 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | 44.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | 594.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | 3.46 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | 55.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | 226.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | 4664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | 4664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3346 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon Pro 460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 21 | Baffin |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 30 October 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 611 | 618 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz | 850 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,858 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.05 GTexel / s | 58.05 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 907 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Taille du laptop | large | large |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.28 GB / s | 81.28 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |