AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • 3x more core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 21.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 48
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 883 gflops
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 1590
  • Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 377
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16007 vs 7012
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4695 vs 2652
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2280 vs 1564
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4695 vs 2652
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2280 vs 1564
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 April 2017 vs 3 January 2017
Core clock speed 907 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 1024 vs 48
Floating-point performance 1,858 gflops vs 883 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3475 vs 1590
PassMark - G2D Mark 724 vs 377
Geekbench - OpenCL 16007 vs 7012
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4695 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2280 vs 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4695 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2280 vs 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 4 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3475
1590
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
724
377
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
16007
7012
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4695
2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2280
1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4695
2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2280
1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
3340
Name AMD Radeon Pro 560 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
PassMark - G3D Mark 3475 1590
PassMark - G2D Mark 724 377
Geekbench - OpenCL 16007 7012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 41.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 614.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 189.085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4695 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2280 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4695 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2280 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 3340

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 560 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Generation 9.5
Code name Polaris 21 Kaby Lake GT3e
Launch date 18 April 2017 3 January 2017
Place in performance rating 624 851
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 907 MHz 300 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,858 gflops 883 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 1024 48
Texture fill rate 58.05 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 189 million
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x1
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Memory bandwidth 81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory 0 1

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
Quick Sync