AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 21.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 48
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 883 gflops
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 1590
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 377
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16007 vs 7012
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4695 vs 2652
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2280 vs 1564
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4695 vs 2652
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2280 vs 1564
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 3 January 2017 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops vs 883 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 vs 1590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 377 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16007 vs 7012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 1590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 377 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16007 | 7012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 3 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 624 | 851 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 883 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
Quick Sync |