AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 560

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
4.5x more core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 200 MHz
5.6x more texture fill rate: 58.05 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
25.6x more pipelines: 1024 vs 40
17.9x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 1180
Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 390
3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15445 vs 5083
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4695 vs 2095
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4695 vs 2095

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 April 2017 vs 27 May 2013
Core clock speed	907 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate	58.05 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 40
Floating-point performance	1,858 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 22 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3475 vs 1180
PassMark - G2D Mark	724 vs 390
Geekbench - OpenCL	15445 vs 5083
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4695 vs 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4695 vs 2095

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 2280
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 2280

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3285 vs 2280
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3285 vs 2280

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3475

1180

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

390

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

15445

5083

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4695

2095

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2280

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4695

2095

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2280

3285

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 560	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark	3475	1180
PassMark - G2D Mark	724	390
Geekbench - OpenCL	15445	5083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	41.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	614.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	189.085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4695	2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2280	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4695	2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2280	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 560	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Generation 7.5
Code name	Polaris 21	Haswell GT3e
Launch date	18 April 2017	27 May 2013
Place in performance rating	611	661
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	907 MHz	200 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,858 gflops	104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	1024	40
Texture fill rate	58.05 GTexel / s	10.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	392 million
Boost clock speed		1300 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	eDRAM
Shared memory	0	1
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
Quick Sync