AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560 and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 560

NVIDIA Quadro 7000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 39% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 651 MHz
Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 58.05 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
Around 39% better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 204 Watt
Around 49% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 3404 MHz
Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 397
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.388 vs 32.699
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 vs 3.796
Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 189.085 vs 110.277

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 April 2017 vs 2 May 2012
Core clock speed	907 MHz vs 651 MHz
Texture fill rate	58.05 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 512
Floating-point performance	1,858 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 204 Watt
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz vs 3404 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	724 vs 397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	41.388 vs 32.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.837 vs 3.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	189.085 vs 110.277

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000

Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3505 vs 3475
Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1142.156 vs 614.695
Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.693 vs 31.274
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 2280
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 2280

Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3505 vs 3475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1142.156 vs 614.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.693 vs 31.274
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3705 vs 2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3705 vs 2280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3475

3505

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

724

397

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

41.388

32.699

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

614.695

1142.156

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.837

3.796

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.274

51.693

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

189.085

110.277

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2280

3705

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2280

3705

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

3353

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 560	NVIDIA Quadro 7000
PassMark - G3D Mark	3475	3505
PassMark - G2D Mark	724	397
Geekbench - OpenCL	15828
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	41.388	32.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	614.695	1142.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.837	3.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.274	51.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	189.085	110.277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2280	3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2280	3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349	3353

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 560	NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Polaris 21	GF110
Launch date	18 April 2017	2 May 2012
Place in performance rating	624	698
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$14,499
Technical info
Core clock speed	907 MHz	651 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,858 gflops	1,332 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	1024	512
Texture fill rate	58.05 GTexel / s	41.66 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	204 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	3,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
Length		248 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB / s	177.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	3404 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0