AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2802.7x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 85 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10296 vs 4551
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10296 vs 4551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 vs 2 September 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 896 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 85 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 vs 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 vs 4551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 7.8x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3715
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3715
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3354
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3354
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6886 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6886 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17482 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17482 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47811 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 17482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 17482 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 681 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9233 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 12 | Bonaire |
| Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | 2 September 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 276 | 274 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.274 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 65.92 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s | 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,882 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 183 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5600M with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
NVIDIATesla T4
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
