AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 53.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 7.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48379 vs 6387
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10296 vs 2792
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10296 vs 2792
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1780
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1780
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2992
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2992
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 687 vs 389
- 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9313 vs 1727
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 vs 10 July 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 48 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48379 vs 6387 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 vs 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 vs 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2992 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 vs 389 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9313 vs 1727 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48379 | 6387 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 | 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 | 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 2992 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 | 389 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9313 | 1727 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) |
Code name | Navi 12 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | 10 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 271 | 814 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.274 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 48 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.92 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | HBM2 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Shared memory | Yes | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync |