AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA GRID K240Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD Radeon Pro 575

NVIDIA GRID K240Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 745 MHz
Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
Around 97% better floating-point performance: 4,506 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 225 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9613 vs 6935
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9613 vs 6935

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 June 2017 vs 28 June 2013
Core clock speed	1096 MHz vs 745 MHz
Texture fill rate	140.8 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2048 vs 1536
Floating-point performance	4,506 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	6800 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9613 vs 6935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9613 vs 6935

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K240Q

Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3938 vs 2814
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3667 vs 3352
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3938 vs 2814
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3667 vs 3352

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3938 vs 2814
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3667 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3938 vs 2814
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3667 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K240Q

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9613

6935

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2814

3938

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3667

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9613

6935

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2814

3938

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3667

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 575	NVIDIA GRID K240Q
Geekbench - OpenCL	34757
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	86.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1090.128
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	7.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	98.349
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	539.686
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9613	6935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2814	3938
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3667
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9613	6935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2814	3938
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3667
PassMark - G3D Mark		2541
PassMark - G2D Mark		212

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 575	NVIDIA GRID K240Q
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler
Code name	Polaris 20	GK104
Launch date	5 June 2017	28 June 2013
Place in performance rating	486	489
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$469
Technical info
Core clock speed	1096 MHz	745 MHz
Floating-point performance	4,506 gflops	2,289 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2048	1536
Texture fill rate	140.8 GTexel / s	95.36 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	5,700 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	217.6 GB / s	160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6800 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5