AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 76.8 billion / sec
- 8x more pipelines: 2048 vs 2x 128
- 5.9x better floating-point performance: 4,506 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 197 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 6.8x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3238
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3238
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 18 March 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s vs 76.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 2x 128 |
Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 197 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3238 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1096 MHz
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1096 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34757 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3238 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 798 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Polaris 20 | G92 |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 18 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 486 | 487 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops | 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 128 |
Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s | 76.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 197 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 256 (128 per GPU) | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, HDMIDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
SLI options | Quad | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 128 (64 per GPU) |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |