AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
• 2.7x better floating-point performance: 4,506 gflops vs 1,659 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.7x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34757 vs 21639
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.88 vs 6.776
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.349 vs 18.431
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 539.686 vs 308.42

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 92.634 vs 86.154
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1146.534 vs 1090.128
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10572 vs 9613
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 2814
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10572 vs 9613
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 2814

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	34757 21639
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	86.154 92.634
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1090.128 1146.534
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.88 6.776
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	98.349 18.431
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	539.686 308.42
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9613 10572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2814 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9613 10572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2814 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3342

Compare specifications (specs)