AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 4216.2x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 vs 6316
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 vs 6316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 March 2019 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- 83.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 12500 million
- 6.1x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70535 vs 53445
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3947
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 10411
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3947
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 10411
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 12500 million |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 vs 53445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 10411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 10411 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53445 | 70535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 27566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 27566 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Greenland | Pitcairn |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Launch date | 19 March 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 228 | 165 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 150 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |