AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 900.1x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 671
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53445 vs 49641
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 vs 2698.914
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3409
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3077
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3409
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3077
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 March 2019 vs 1 October 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 vs 671 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53445 vs 49641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 vs 2698.914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 vs 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 vs 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 3077 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 125x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 12500 million
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 11.5x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12384 vs 11300
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 vs 135.416
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.206 vs 12.678
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 927.006 vs 883.876
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 vs 11925
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 vs 11925
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 12500 million |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12384 vs 11300 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 vs 135.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 vs 12.678 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 vs 883.876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 vs 11925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 vs 11925 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 12384 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 671 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53445 | 49641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 223.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 2698.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 14.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 927.006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 15489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 15489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 3409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3077 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6008 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | Pascal |
| Code name | Greenland | GP104 |
| GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
| Launch date | 19 March 2019 | 1 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 228 | 232 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
| Price now | $1,699.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.38 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 100 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 9016 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
