AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 2581 MHz
• Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 230 Watt
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20826 vs 15315
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20826 vs 15315

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 2200 MHz
• Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 vs 15383
• Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 100473 vs 73128
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 349.422 vs 270.025
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 4980.223
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 34.064 vs 20.735
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 vs 135.303
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1699.337 vs 1054.582
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 15778
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 42325
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 15778
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 42325

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	15383 19824
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	947 946
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	73128 100473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	270.025 349.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4980.223 7129.567
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.735 34.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.303 197.183
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1054.582 1699.337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20826 15315
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15778 18062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42325 50772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20826 15315
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15778 18062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42325 50772

Compare specifications (specs)