AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA RTX A5000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 88% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1170 MHz
• Around 71% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1695 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 3714
• 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 3355
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 3714
• 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 3355

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000

• Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 433.9 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
• 4.6x more pipelines: 8192 vs 1792
• 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22619 vs 15441
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1029 vs 966
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 155384 vs 72987
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 270.025
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 vs 4980.223
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 20.735
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 vs 135.303
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 vs 1054.582
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 vs 20826
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 vs 20826

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	15441 22619
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	966 1029
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	72987 155384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	270.025 581.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4980.223 6836.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.735 54.372
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.303 191.518
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1054.582 2038.811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20826 22508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15778 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42325 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20826 22508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15778 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42325 3355

Compare specifications (specs)