AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon R9 290
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 947 MHz
- 2145.9x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 6300
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 6300
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 5 November 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 947 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 vs 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 vs 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 6300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3354 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8313 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1366.314 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3684 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | AMD Radeon R9 290 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 23 | Hawaii |
| Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 5 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 270 | 348 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 947 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 151.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 6,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,849 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 320.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
