AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 2.5x more boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- 2982.6x more texture fill rate: 325.1 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
- Around 8% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1664
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 148 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15257 vs 11499
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15257 vs 11499
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3340
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3340
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 vs 19 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1664 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 148 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 vs 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 vs 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3340 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9646 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27020 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.76 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 489.884 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3622 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 23 | GM204 |
Launch date | 8 Jun 2021 | 19 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 270 | 357 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Price now | $407.76 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | |
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1664 |
Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 325.1 GTexel/s | 109 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 148 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1664 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pins |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |