AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
627.2x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2428 vs 1461
3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14535 vs 4466
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2524 vs 2475
3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 958
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2304
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2524 vs 2475
3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 958
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2304

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2428 vs 1461
Geekbench - OpenCL	14535 vs 4466
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2524 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2524 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 2304

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1082 MHz
4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 444

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 1082 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	569 vs 444

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2428

1461

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

444

569

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14535

4466

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

2475

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

958

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

2304

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2524

2475

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3274

958

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

2304

Name	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G3D Mark	2428	1461
PassMark - G2D Mark	444	569
Geekbench - OpenCL	14535	4466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.896
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	486.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	53.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	100.658
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2524	2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3274	958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2524	2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3274	958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	2304

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Essentials
Architecture	Polaris	Generation 8.0
Code name	Lexa	Broadwell GT3e
Launch date	27 May 2019	5 September 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$199
Place in performance rating	813	789
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1082 MHz	1150 MHz
Compute units	10
Core clock speed	925 MHz	300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	86.56 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1,385 GFLOPS
Pixel fill rate	17.31 GPixel/s
Stream Processors	640
Texture fill rate	34.62 GTexel/s	55.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	189 million
Floating-point performance		883.2 gflops
Pipelines		48
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	Half Height
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x1
Length	6.6" (168 mm)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5
Shared memory		1
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Quick Sync