AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1053 MHz vs 925 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 200 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 420 vs 367
• 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 13686
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.158 vs 40.311
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 876.241 vs 795.334
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.983 vs 3.328
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.599 vs 64.205
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.258 vs 181.508
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3348
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3348

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

• Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 103.6 GTexel / s vs 58.97 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1792 vs 896
• Around 76% better floating-point performance: 3,315 gflops vs 1,887 gflops
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2718 vs 2528
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4396 vs 3301
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 2086
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4396 vs 3301
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 2086

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2528 2718
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	420 367
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	51217 13686
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.158 40.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	876.241 795.334
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.983 3.328
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.599 64.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	194.258 181.508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3301 4396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2086 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3301 4396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2086 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 3348

Compare specifications (specs)