AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1086 MHz vs 876 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• 833.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 778 vs 630
• Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25596 vs 23870
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.861 vs 62.027
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1362.14 vs 1218.137
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.025 vs 5.835
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 106.141 vs 36.842
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 250.267 vs 215.546

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 713 MHz
• Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 121.6 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 2688 vs 1792
• Around 21% better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 3,892 gflops
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8190 vs 5582
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10176 vs 5579
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1691
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1565
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10176 vs 5579
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1691
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1565

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5582 8190
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	778 630
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	25596 23870
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.861 62.027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1362.14 1218.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.025 5.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	106.141 36.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	250.267 215.546
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5579 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1691 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1565 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5579 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1691 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1565 3356

Compare specifications (specs)