AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13044 vs 6316
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 27566
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13044 vs 6316
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 27566
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 27566 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70535 vs 69812
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 7164
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 7164
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 vs 69812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 7164 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 | 70535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 | 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 | 27566 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Vega 10 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 13 March 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 118 | 165 |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600S
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
AppleM1 Max 24-core
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
