AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 791
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 153.677
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3717
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3357
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3717
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1530 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 13932
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 69812
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 171.616
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 4031.404
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 16.925
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1195.863
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 13044
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 13044

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13932 18872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	815 791
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	69812 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.616 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4031.404 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.925 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	247.788 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1195.863 1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13044 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7164 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30936 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13044 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7164 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30936 3357

Compare specifications (specs)