AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 173.7x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 7 December 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 931 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 919 vs 370
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19673 vs 4769
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 931 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 919 vs 370 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19673 vs 4769 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | NVIDIA TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | 919 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4769 | 19673 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155548 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.669 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15401 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15401 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Volta |
| Code name | Polaris 22 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 7 December 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 301 | 157 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Compute performance | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 161.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 32.35 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 65 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5000 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 1024 bit | 3072 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) | 1700 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||