AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 780 MHz vs 753 MHz
- 2.2x more pipelines: 320 vs 144
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 388.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 111
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4947 vs 2860
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 7.699
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.009 vs 0.727
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 12.581
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 21.909
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs 27 October 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz vs 753 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 144 |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops vs 388.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 111 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4947 vs 2860 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.569 vs 7.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.009 vs 0.727 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.668 vs 12.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.819 vs 21.909 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 654 vs 544
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 vs 162.886
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1134 vs 1119
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 vs 1284
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 vs 2264
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1134 vs 1119
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 vs 1284
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 vs 2264
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 654 vs 544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 vs 162.886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1134 vs 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 vs 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 vs 2264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1134 vs 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 vs 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 vs 2264 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 544 | 654 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 111 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4947 | 2860 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.569 | 7.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.886 | 252.895 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.009 | 0.727 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.668 | 12.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.819 | 21.909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1119 | 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1284 | 2265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2264 | 2827 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1119 | 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1284 | 2265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2264 | 2827 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Oland | GF106 |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 | 27 October 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1414 | 1417 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 753 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | 388.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 144 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | Up to 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3\DDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |