AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 16x more pipelines: 256 vs 16
• 11.6x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 5.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2906 vs 541
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 vs 7.36
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 12.009
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 754
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 754

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• 3.3x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 200 MHz
• Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 800 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 6.166
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 119.568
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.543
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1363
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1915
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1363
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1915

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2906 541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.166 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	119.568 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.543 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.649 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.459 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	966 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1363 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1915 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	966 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1363 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1915 2392

Compare specifications (specs)