AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 260X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.745 vs 37.505
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.673 vs 3.09
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.088 vs 40.457
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 221.539 vs 84.186
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 25 June 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 vs 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 vs 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 vs 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 vs 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 896
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 vs 3192
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 523
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 vs 804.436
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 3845
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3485
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 3845
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3485
- Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 vs 1481
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 1,971 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 vs 3192 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 vs 804.436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 vs 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 vs 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3485 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 vs 1481 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 260X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 260X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3192 | 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 | 532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 804.436 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3845 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3485 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3845 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3485 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 | 1659 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 260X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Bonaire | GK104 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 25 June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | $249 |
| Place in performance rating | 614 | 576 |
| Price now | $239 | $249.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.15 | 23.69 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | 2,378 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1152 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 94.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1152 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 260X with others
AMDRadeon R7 260X vs
ATIFirePro M7740
AMDRadeon R7 260X vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4270 IGP
AMDRadeon R7 260X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R7 260X vs
AMDRadeon R9 M270X
AMDRadeon R7 260X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
AMDRadeon R7 260X vs
AMDRadeon RX 550X
