AMD Radeon R7 350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 900x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 vs 642.715
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 vs 26.532
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3329
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 July 2016 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 vs 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 vs 26.532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- Around 70% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
- Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 7787
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 25.508
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 2.72
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 109.558
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2072
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3122
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2072
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3122
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 819.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 7787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 25.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 2.72 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 109.558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3122 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3329 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cape Verde | GM107 |
| Launch date | 6 July 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1083 | 707 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $299.01 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 350 with others
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 XT
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDFirePro M4150
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
IntelUHD Graphics P630
