AMD Radeon R7 350 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 350
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 60 Watt
- 900x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 versus 642.715
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 versus 26.532
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3329
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3329
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 60 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 versus 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 versus 26.532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3329 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Environ 28% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 70% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.4 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 512
- Environ 70% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,389 gflops versus 819.2 gflops
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 7787
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 25.508
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 2.72
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 109.558
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 2072
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3122
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 2072
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3122
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops versus 819.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 7787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 25.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 2.72 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 109.558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3122 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3329 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1083 | 707 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 350 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 XT
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDFirePro M4150
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
IntelUHD Graphics P630
