AMD Radeon R7 350 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA Tesla M2090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R7 350

NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 23% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 650 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
4.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3700 MHz

Launch date	6 July 2016 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed	800 MHz vs 650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz vs 3700 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
Around 63% better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13075 vs 7729
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.87 vs 25.508
Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1127.187 vs 647.813
Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.833 vs 2.72
Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.33 vs 44.6
Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 119.136 vs 109.558

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	36.4 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,331.2 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	13075 vs 7729
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	33.87 vs 25.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1127.187 vs 647.813
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.833 vs 2.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	57.33 vs 44.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	119.136 vs 109.558

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2090

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7729

13075

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25.508

33.87

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

647.813

1127.187

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.72

3.833

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

44.6

57.33

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

109.558

119.136

Name	AMD Radeon R7 350	NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Geekbench - OpenCL	7729	13075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	25.508	33.87
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	647.813	1127.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.72	3.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.6	57.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	109.558	119.136
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 350	NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Cape Verde	GF110
Launch date	6 July 2016	25 July 2011
Place in performance rating	1115	1118
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	800 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	819.2 gflops	1,331.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	512	512
Texture fill rate	25.6 GTexel / s	36.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	1,500 million	3,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	168 mm	248 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	72 GB / s	177.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	3700 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5