AMD Radeon R7 360 vs AMD Radeon HD 8690M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 360 and AMD Radeon HD 8690M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz
  • 3.1x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 16.5 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
  • 3.1x better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 528.0 gflops
  • 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3138 vs 984
  • 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16200 vs 5079
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 vs 1579
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 1813
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3178
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 vs 1579
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 1813
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3178
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 June 2015 vs 1 March 2013
Boost clock speed 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz
Texture fill rate 50.4 GTexel / s vs 16.5 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 384
Floating-point performance 1,613 gflops vs 528.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3138 vs 984
Geekbench - OpenCL 16200 vs 5079
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4799 vs 1579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 4147 vs 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3178
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4799 vs 1579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 4147 vs 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3178

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8690M

  • 3.8x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 516
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 768 vs 516

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8690M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3138
984
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
516
768
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
16200
5079
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4799
1579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4147
1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3178
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4799
1579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4147
1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3178
Name AMD Radeon R7 360 AMD Radeon HD 8690M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3138 984
PassMark - G2D Mark 516 768
Geekbench - OpenCL 16200 5079
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 38.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 819.203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 58.285
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 188.858
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4799 1579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 4147 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3178
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4799 1579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 4147 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3178
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1402

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 360 AMD Radeon HD 8690M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Tobago Sun
Design AMD Radeon R7 300 Series AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series
Launch date 18 June 2015 1 March 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $109
Place in performance rating 627 629
Price now $146.65
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 29.24

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz 775 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,613 gflops 528.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 384
Stream Processors 768
Texture fill rate 50.4 GTexel / s 16.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt
Transistor count 2,080 million 1,040 million
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 775 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Length 165 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 11
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 112 GB/s 32 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1050 MHz 4000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)