AMD Radeon R7 360 vs AMD Radeon R9 M270X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 360 and AMD Radeon R9 M270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3138 vs 1204
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 306
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 3717
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 3717
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 21 March 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3138 vs 1204 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 vs 306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 vs 3717 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M270X
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1050 MHz
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M270X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 360 | AMD Radeon R9 M270X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3138 | 1204 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 | 306 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16200 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 360 | AMD Radeon R9 M270X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Tobago | Venus |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 21 March 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Place in performance rating | 627 | 628 |
| Price now | $146.65 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Stream Processors | 768 | |
| Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 165 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 360 with others
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M270X
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4
