AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 850 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 66% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 108 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1901 vs 1345
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 335
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.788 vs 9.373
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 638.196 vs 459.025
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.619 vs 0.906
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 vs 27.022
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 vs 48.793
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2809 vs 2636
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 2673
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2799
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2809 vs 2636
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 2673
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2799

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770

• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• Around 56% higher pipelines: 800 vs 512
• Around 44% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
• Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 4500 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10495 vs 9694

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1901 1345
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	530 335
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9694 10495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.788 9.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	638.196 459.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.619 0.906
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.414 27.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	112.347 48.793
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2799

Compare specifications (specs)