AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 900x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 521
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 vs 26.532
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3329
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• Around 47% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
• Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1901
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 9694
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 24.788
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 638.196
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 2.619
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 112.347
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2809
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2809

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1901 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	530 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9694 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.788 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	638.196 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.619 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.414 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	112.347 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3329

Compare specifications (specs)