AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 270X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 876 MHz
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.87 vs 62.027
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.72 vs 1218.137
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.354 vs 5.835
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 vs 36.842
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.412 vs 215.546
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 19 February 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.87 vs 62.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 vs 1218.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.354 vs 5.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 vs 36.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 vs 215.546 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 84 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 2688 vs 1280
- Around 75% better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 2,688 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8190 vs 4889
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 611
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10176 vs 8068
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10176 vs 8068
- Around 64% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2901 vs 1771
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec vs 84 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 1280 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops vs 2,688 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8190 vs 4889 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 vs 611 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 vs 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 vs 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 vs 1771 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 270X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 270X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4889 | 8190 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 611 | 630 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.87 | 62.027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 | 1218.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.354 | 5.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 | 36.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 | 215.546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 | 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 | 10176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1771 | 2901 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23870 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 270X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Curacao | GK110 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 19 February 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $999 |
| Place in performance rating | 439 | 428 |
| Price now | $399 | $2,054.59 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | 5.09 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,688 gflops | 4,709 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2688 |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
| Texture fill rate | 84 GTexel / s | 187.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 7,080 million |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 2688 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 270X with others
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 560
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870 X2
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDFirePro W7100
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDRadeon E6465
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
