AMD Radeon R9 Fury vs AMD FireStream 9270
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD FireStream 9270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 7.5x more texture fill rate: 224.0 GTexel / s vs 30 GTexel / s
- 4.5x more pipelines: 3584 vs 800
- 6x better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 1,200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 7.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9571 vs 1341
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 473
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2015 vs 13 November 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s vs 30 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 800 |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops vs 1,200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9571 vs 1341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 vs 473 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9270
- Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 7.2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 500 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9270
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | AMD FireStream 9270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9571 | 1341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 473 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53279 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 Fury | AMD FireStream 9270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Fiji | RV770 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch date | 10 July 2015 | 13 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Place in performance rating | 291 | 294 |
Price now | $399.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Compute units | 56 | |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 800 |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s | 30 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 956 million |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |