AMD Radeon R9 Fury vs AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Fury and AMD Radeon HD 7750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 12.2x more texture fill rate: 224.0 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- 7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 512
- 12.2x better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 8.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9593 vs 1191
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 693
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3551
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 July 2015 vs 24 April 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops vs 588.8 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9593 vs 1191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 vs 693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750M
- 9.8x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 500 MHz
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | AMD Radeon HD 7750M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9593 | 1191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 693 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10116 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10116 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 Fury | AMD Radeon HD 7750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Fiji | Chelsea |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
| Launch date | 10 July 2015 | 24 April 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
| Place in performance rating | 290 | 288 |
| Price now | $399.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Compute units | 56 | |
| Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 512 |
| Stream Processors | 3584 | |
| Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel / s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Transistor count | 8,900 million | 1,500 million |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 Fury with others
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
AMDFireStream 9270
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750M
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
AMDRadeon R9 290X2
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon R9 Fury vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
