AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 M275

NVIDIA Quadro 5000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 75% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 513 MHz
Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 22.57 GTexel / s
Around 82% higher pipelines: 640 vs 352
Around 64% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 722.3 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 387
Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9231 vs 7451
Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.064 vs 16.451
Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.206 vs 1.925
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.381 vs 17.065
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.685 vs 46.591

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	28 January 2014 vs 23 February 2011
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 513 MHz
Texture fill rate	37 GTexel / s vs 22.57 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 352
Floating-point performance	1,184 gflops vs 722.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	569 vs 387
Geekbench - OpenCL	9231 vs 7451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	28.064 vs 16.451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.206 vs 1.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	34.381 vs 17.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	121.685 vs 46.591

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000

Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 2560 MB vs 2 GB
Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1932 vs 1115
Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 511.131 vs 313.463
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3104 vs 1162
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 vs 1717
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3104 vs 1162
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 vs 1717

Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size	2560 MB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1932 vs 1115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	511.131 vs 313.463
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3104 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3316 vs 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3104 vs 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3316 vs 1717

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1115

1932

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

569

387

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9231

7451

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

28.064

16.451

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

313.463

511.131

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.206

1.925

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

34.381

17.065

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

121.685

46.591

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1162

3104

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1717

3316

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1162

3104

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1717

3316

Name	AMD Radeon R9 M275	NVIDIA Quadro 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark	1115	1932
PassMark - G2D Mark	569	387
Geekbench - OpenCL	9231	7451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	28.064	16.451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	313.463	511.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.206	1.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	34.381	17.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	121.685	46.591
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1162	3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1717	3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1162	3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1717	3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2602

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 M275	NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Venus	GF100
Launch date	28 January 2014	23 February 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$799.99	$2,499
Place in performance rating	983	978
Price now	$699.99	$268
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	3.01	12.71
Technical info
Boost clock speed	925 MHz
Core clock speed	900 MHz	513 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,184 gflops	722.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	640	352
Texture fill rate	37 GTexel / s	22.57 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,500 million	3,100 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		152 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Length		248 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2560 MB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	120.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0