AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 31.36 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 57% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 325
• Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9231 vs 4933
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.064 vs 12.449
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.206 vs 1.295
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.381 vs 24.566
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.685 vs 28.025

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1695 vs 1115
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 vs 313.463
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 1162
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 1717
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 1162
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 1717

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1115 1695
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	569 325
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9231 4933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.064 12.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	313.463 455.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.206 1.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.381 24.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.685 28.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1162 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1717 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1162 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1717 3344

Compare specifications (specs)