AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275X and NVIDIA Tesla M2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 57% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
  • Around 15% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.109 vs 23.848
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 January 2014 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate 37 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 448
Floating-point performance 1,184 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 28.109 vs 23.848

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2050

  • 2.7x more memory clock speed: 3092 MHz vs 1125 MHz
  • 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36584 vs 11041
  • 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 966.795 vs 283.116
  • Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.15 vs 2.187
  • Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 33.837
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.318 vs 91.407
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 3092 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 36584 vs 11041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 966.795 vs 283.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.15 vs 2.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.227 vs 33.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 95.318 vs 91.407

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
11041
36584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
28.109
23.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
283.116
966.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.187
3.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
33.837
44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
91.407
95.318
Name AMD Radeon R9 M275X NVIDIA Tesla M2050
PassMark - G3D Mark 1537
PassMark - G2D Mark 307
Geekbench - OpenCL 11041 36584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 28.109 23.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 283.116 966.795
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.187 3.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 33.837 44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 91.407 95.318
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1705
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1705

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M275X NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi
Code name Venus GF100
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch date 28 January 2014 25 July 2011
Place in performance rating 1125 1128
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $2,699

Technical info

Boost clock speed 925 MHz
Compute units 10
Core clock speed 900 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,184 gflops 1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 640 448
Texture fill rate 37 GTexel / s 32.2 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,500 million 3,100 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 11 12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s 148.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz 3092 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore