AMD Radeon R9 M360 vs ATI FirePro V7800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M360 and ATI FirePro V7800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 M360

ATI FirePro V7800

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 29% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 700 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 307
Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8211 vs 4894
Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.479 vs 15.084
Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.902 vs 1.448
44.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2801 vs 63

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 26 April 2010
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 700 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	399 vs 307
Geekbench - OpenCL	8211 vs 4894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	19.479 vs 15.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.902 vs 1.448
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2801 vs 63

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V7800

Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
2.8x more pipelines: 1440 vs 512
2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2028 vs 1805
Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1124.892 vs 575.773
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.448 vs 34.15
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 181.538 vs 87.811
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 vs 2801

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	50.4 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1440 vs 512
Floating-point performance	2,016.0 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2028 vs 1805
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1124.892 vs 575.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	39.448 vs 34.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	181.538 vs 87.811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3721 vs 2801

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V7800

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1805

2028

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

399

307

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8211

4894

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.479

15.084

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

575.773

1124.892

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.902

1.448

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

34.15

39.448

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

87.811

181.538

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2801

3721

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2801

Name	AMD Radeon R9 M360	ATI FirePro V7800
PassMark - G3D Mark	1805	2028
PassMark - G2D Mark	399	307
Geekbench - OpenCL	8211	4894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	19.479	15.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	575.773	1124.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.902	1.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	34.15	39.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	87.811	181.538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2801	3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1623
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2801	63
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1623
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 M360	ATI FirePro V7800
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	TeraScale 2
Code name	Tropo	Cypress
Design	AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date	5 May 2015	26 April 2010
Place in performance rating	1008	1010
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$759
Technical info
Boost clock speed	925 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	900 MHz	700 MHz
Floating-point performance	947.2 gflops	2,016.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	512	1440
Texture fill rate	29.6 GTexel / s	50.4 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,500 million	2,154 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		150 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Eyefinity
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		254 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	11.2 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	72 GB / s	128.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore