AMD Radeon R9 M360 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M360 and NVIDIA Tesla K20c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 706 MHz
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 12 November 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20c
- 5x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- 4.9x more pipelines: 2496 vs 512
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 91% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15597 vs 8176
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.423 vs 19.479
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1427.15 vs 575.773
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.128 vs 1.902
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.383 vs 34.15
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 179.044 vs 87.811
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2496 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15597 vs 8176 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.423 vs 19.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1427.15 vs 575.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.128 vs 1.902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.383 vs 34.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.044 vs 87.811 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20c
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M360 | NVIDIA Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1812 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8176 | 15597 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.479 | 39.423 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 | 1427.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.902 | 4.128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 | 64.383 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.811 | 179.044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2801 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1623 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2801 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1623 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M360 | NVIDIA Tesla K20c | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tropo | GK110 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 12 November 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1003 | 1006 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 3,524 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2496 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 146.8 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 7,080 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 208.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M360 with others
AMDRadeon R9 M360 vs
NVIDIATesla K20c
AMDRadeon R9 M360 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M275
AMDRadeon R9 M360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M360 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M445DX
AMDRadeon R9 M360 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P400
