AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs AMD Radeon HD 6550D

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375 and AMD Radeon HD 6550D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 640 vs 400
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 970 vs 401
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 162 vs 131
  • 7.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10130 vs 1345
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2227 vs 1382
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2227 vs 1382
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 30 June 2011
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz
Pipelines 640 vs 400
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 970 vs 401
PassMark - G2D Mark 162 vs 131
Geekbench - OpenCL 10130 vs 1345
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2227 vs 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2227 vs 1382

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6550D

  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1975 vs 1850
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 2112
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1975 vs 1850
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 2112
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1975 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3324 vs 2112
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1975 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3324 vs 2112

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6550D

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
970
401
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
162
131
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
10130
1345
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2227
1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1850
1975
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2112
3324
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2227
1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1850
1975
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2112
3324
Name AMD Radeon R9 M375 AMD Radeon HD 6550D
PassMark - G3D Mark 970 401
PassMark - G2D Mark 162 131
Geekbench - OpenCL 10130 1345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 29.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 272.547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.994
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 142.872
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2227 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1850 1975
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2112 3324
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2227 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1850 1975
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2112 3324

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M375 AMD Radeon HD 6550D

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Terascale 2
Code name Tropo Llano
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date 5 May 2015 30 June 2011
Place in performance rating 1243 1245
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1015 MHz
Compute units 10
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,299 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 640 400
Texture fill rate 40.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,500 million 1000 Million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 11
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1100 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0 1

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore